Philadelphia's Lower Merion School District will pay $610,000 to settle the webcam spying lawsuits brought against them by two former high school students. Lawyers for the students provided evidence in a pretrial hearing that demonstrated that the school had secretly snapped webcam images of students which included photos of them at home, in their beds and evenly partially dressed.
Laptops that the school issued to students contained a tracking program that the shcool maintains was only used to track lost or stolen laptaps, but Blake Robbins, who filed the initial lawsuit last February, realized his laptop had been spying on him when school officials reprimanded him for behavior based on photos that were taken of him in his home. Jalil Hasan, who brought the second suit against the school district, learned of the hundreds of photographs taken of him in a letter from a lawyer that was leading Lower Marion's investigation of the webcam spying allegations.
Lower Marion continues to use the tracking software to identify lost or stolen laptops but has revised its policies and said the built in cameras in the Macbooks will no longer be activated or monitored.
One could imagine that this type of invasion of privacy is the kind of stuff that high schoolers' nightmares are made of and you have to wonder if other district students with school issued laptops have been approaching the Macbooks with caution and routinely throwing black cloth over the 'seeing eyes' of their computers.







Comments: 9
I believe the camera's should be available in the "worse case" situations but have to be unlocked by a law enforcement agency and school administrator. A camera can be use to catch a thief or murder.
You notice they didn't discuss the "turing off" of the microphone in the above article. That, in itself, can be used for quite deadly purposes as well. If someone can "record", they can determine the likes and dislikes of an individual or their "patterns". In turn, they can use that information to develop a "specific" form of harassment. It would be similar to your best friend supplying information to harass you in public.
Also, a person could use the information to fake on-line identities and "entice" the student on a networking site. That is a bit scary as well. For example, they could determine that the student likes a certain type of woman/girl and use the information to "create a fake identity" with a picture that entices the student.
At that point, they could use the networking site to affect the audio and "black mail" the student in latter life. What if that student became a doctor, lawyer, judge, wealthy business man, etc???
What if the young male or female student was curious and tried a homosexual relationship?
I agree with "legal access" that may reduce school violence or save a life. Also, it may catch a thief and allow a computer to be returned intact. On the other hand, the video, audio, and "web surfing" should be strictly controlled. Also, the people doing the "monitoring" should be monitored. Who will monitor them?
Eventually, a database system will have to be created that can be accessed to see who was monitoring, where the student had visited, what their recordings were about, and who did the employee contact?
That is big brother. For this reason, a very special control should be in place.
The only problem with the payout is that it will come out of taxpayers' pockets and not the people who caused the problem in the first place!