Steve Jobs may have lost his battle to cancer this year, but that doesn't make him any less fascinating. The technology icon has left his imprint on modern society and will never be forgotten—this is just one of the reasons that Barbara Walters chose him as the Most Fascinating Person of 2011.
However, it wasn't his death that prompted this honor. Walters actually chose him over the summer, when he announced his retirement. Jobs isn't anything less than an innovator and he deserves the title. "It's unlikely there will ever be anyone like him again," Walters said.
Steve Jobs didn't only advance technology with items like the iPod and the iPhone, he also flexed his movie muscle and helped create Pixar, which has really changed the word "animated" for good. He was an amazing man who did amazing things, and many would agree that he was taken from the earth too soon. Who knows what else he could have come up with over the next 30+ years? He was fascinating... still is fascinating, and Barbara Walters definitely got it right.
© Effie Orfanides 2011
by
Effie Orfanides
Member since:
February 24, 2010 Steve Jobs Is Most Fascinating Person of 2011
December 15, 2011 11:25 AM UTC
(Updated: December 15, 2011 03:25 PM UTC)
4 people recommend this
|
comments: 8
Find more about:
steve jobs,
steve jobs fascinating person,
barbara walters,
steve jobs barbara walters,
technology
Find Gather groups:
Gather Technology News Channel
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
|
||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Version 18247, "Zach"; Copyright © 2013 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.







Comments: 8
Jobs had a flair for industrial design although he didn't have the technical skills to do it for a living.
Jobs' main skill was trend spotting. Regardless of the number of patents in his name he never invented anything. He had an eye for emerging technology. Apple and Jobs got things to market after others had done the groundwork.
Real innovators in computers and electronics are people like Vinton Cerf, who was the primary architect of the Internet, or Alan Kay who headed the group at Xerox that developed everything that Apple used in the Mac.
The PARC work was an inspiration and not a source for Apple's designs. If it were just a matter of saying "hey, I want some of that," then Apple wouldn't have floundered while Jobs was off making a nascent success of NEXT Computer (and reviving Apple magnificently when he returned).
Pixar was a successful operation before Jobs arrived. It was nine years after Jobs came on board that Disney bought Toy Story for a (relative) song--and locked themselves into a high-cost, and successful, commitment to Pixar that culminated in their $7.4 Billion purchase of Pixar 11 years later.
With Apple products there is always a firm sense that someone is minding the store--the interfaces are reliable and intuitive; the support is nonpareil; it all works. That has always gone from Jobs all the way down. I hope it will continue.
Mind you, you do pay a little extra for the Apple level of quality. For a lot of people it's worth it. I'm cheap and don't mind working without a net. :)
If the iPod played flac files I might consider one. Meanwhile I'll stick to my $40 Sansa player. It plays flac files and supports micro-sd cards. On the con side, the display is too small to read when I'm driving and I can't control it from a car stereo.
That reminds me that Apple products tend to have a much longer useful life than competing brands. That might be a leveler when considering the TCO of competing products. Incidentally, I'm posting this comment from the phone. The small screen is a bit cumbersome for working with lengthy Gather threads, but they load and display flawlessly. I'm glad Apple entered, and revolutionized, the smartphone market. I'm also grateful for Google's work with Android, because it should make for healthy competition and drive innovation.